|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Date: August 27, 2004 It is suggested that something bad or even catastrophic might be happening to the climate; can we manage the consequences? The substantial costs of reducing human influences on climate change are biting now, but the benefits may not be evident for centuries. Are Abrupt Climate Change (ACC) and Negative Emission Technologies (NET) properly appreciated in the assessment of climate risk management strategies? Despite enormous efforts in building emission scenarios, the attainability of CO2 concentration targets has not been assessed. Do additional options enable the reduction of atmospheric CO2 concentrations to levels lower than what could otherwise have been achieved? Can NET substantially reduce the cost of low emission scenarios, and thus improve mankind's ability to manage climate risks? Aviott John, IIASA - International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Austria Philip Campbell, Editor-in-Chief of Nature, London, UK Bert Bolin, Meteorologiska institutionen Stockholms Universitet Stockholm, Sweden Michael Obersteiner, IIASA - International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Laxenburg, Austria Christian Azar, Department of Physical Resource Theory Chalmers Göteborg, Sweden The plenary session is held on 27 August at 14:45-16:15 Venue: Norra Latin, Musiksalen.
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Adress: EuroScience Open Forum 2004, c/o Swedish Research Council, SE - 103 78 STOCKHOLM © 2002 EuroScience Open Forum 2004. All rights reserved. |